Google Leak Spills the Secret Sauce for Search Rankings — Here’s What to Know

It’s the biggest peek into Google’s search secrets yet.

By Sherin Shibu | edited by Melissa Malamut | May 31, 2024
Comment

Key Takeaways

  • 2,500 internal Google documents were leaked this week.
  • The leak shows potential inaccuracies between what Google spokespeople publicly stated and what was happening under the hood.

With over of the global search engine market, Google’s search algorithm acts as a gatekeeper for the majority of people who want to find answers on the web.

For the first time, a massive internal document offers a glimpse into how Search works — and there are inaccuracies between the documents and what Google has publicly stated about Search in the past.

The 2,500 document leak was unearthed by SEO practitioner and EA Eagle Digital founder earlier this month, confirmed by SEO experts and on Monday, and publicly by Google on Wednesday.

Azimi he had “no financial motives” for leaking the information. He stated that his main motive was getting the truth to come out.

Related: Google Might Start Charging For AI-Enhanced Search Features

Even though Google spokespeople have over the years that clicks factor into rankings, the documents show that Google appears to have kept track of clicks, down to how long users spend on a webpage.

Google also appears to consider subdomains separately from domains, which directly past statements.

And yet another inaccuracy, Google has that it does not consider the age of a website in rankings or push down new websites, but the documents show that it does.

Fishkin identified the key takeaways from the leak as:

  1. Google cares about brand recognition and prioritizes big, powerful brands over small, independent ones — even if smaller brands more expertise.
  2. Powerful brands can rank well on Google, even with lower E-E-A-T, or experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness.

“Google no longer rewards scrappy, clever, SEO-savvy operators who know all the right tricks,” Fishkin wrote. “They reward established brands, search-measurable forms of popularity, and established domains that searchers already know and click.”

Related: Site Traffic Down? Here Are the Big AI Changes Google Made to Its Search Tool

The leak may have occurred when Google accidentally published the internal documents to Microsoft-owned GitHub in March, per Fishkin.

“We would caution against making inaccurate assumptions about Search based on out-of-context, outdated, or incomplete information,” Google spokesperson Davis Thompson in a Wednesday statement to The Verge. “We’ve shared extensive information about how Search works and the types of factors that our systems weigh, while also working to protect the integrity of our results from manipulation.”

Google made public-facing changes to Search earlier this month, including a new AI overviews section at the top of search results. The move has yielded inaccurate answers, which have since gone viral on social media, including one post telling users to make pizza sauce with glue.

Related: Google’s New AI Search Results Are Already Hallucinating — Telling Users to Eat Rocks and Make Pizza Sauce With Glue

Key Takeaways

  • 2,500 internal Google documents were leaked this week.
  • The leak shows potential inaccuracies between what Google spokespeople publicly stated and what was happening under the hood.

With over of the global search engine market, Google’s search algorithm acts as a gatekeeper for the majority of people who want to find answers on the web.

For the first time, a massive internal document offers a glimpse into how Search works — and there are inaccuracies between the documents and what Google has publicly stated about Search in the past.

The 2,500 document leak was unearthed by SEO practitioner and EA Eagle Digital founder earlier this month, confirmed by SEO experts and on Monday, and publicly by Google on Wednesday.

Sherin Shibu • News Reporter

Âé¶¹Éç Staff
Sherin Shibu is a business news reporter at Âé¶¹Éç.com. She previously worked for PCMag, Business... Read more
Join the Conversation
Leave a comment. Be kind. Critique ideas, not people.
Sort: |

Related Content